Thursday Theology #600
December 10, 2009
Topic: Further Conversation on "30,000 More Charioteers into the Red Sea?"
Colleagues,
Last week's ThTh post (599) concluded by asking for help from the listserve
readership to finish out the six-step CROSSING phase of linking President
Obama's "30,000 more" speech and Steve's Kuhl's Biblical GROUNDING in the
Gospel for Advent I. ThTh 599 had offered only the first three steps, the "bad
news" crossovers between that Biblical text and the American scene.
"Finish out" meant spelling out the last three steps, the "good news" steps, to
bring the Gospel's own new prognosis as articulated in the Biblical text to
the American scene. So I asked for some audience participation.
Only three responses have come in so far. One just citing a "secular
prophet," with no comment. Here it is.
ROBERT BOROSAGE
Imperial Blues
President Obama made the best possible case for dispatching more
troops to Afghanistan last night. But his speech left me with a haunting
foreboding. Surely this is the way that great imperial powers decline. Their
soldiers police the ends of the earth. There is always another enemy, always a
threat - sometimes imagined, often real - that must be faced. And meanwhile,
the productive economy declines, the rich live increasingly off investments
abroad, the poor depend on public sustenance, the middle declines.
Another arrived --from Steve Kuhl himself--promising something by next week
Thursday--after he gets all those final exams graded from his students at
Cardinal Strich University in Milwaukee.
And one from a pastor in Michigan "spelled it out."
Granted, I had to tease it out of David Boedecker after he first asked for
me to "just do it" myself. David is pastor of Christ Lutheran congregation
in Marshall, Michigan. He's been pastoring for "25-plus" years, he tells
me. Our email exchange amounted to a trilogy. I reprint all of it below FYI.
Peace and Joy!
Ed Schroeder
Dear Ed.
It's not that I disagree with you, but I don't know how to meld your
"jeremiad" with that good old Lutheran question, "What does this mean?"
Ought one not pray (not proclaim) but pray for God to bless America with
compassion, kindness, wisdom and dare we hope, righteousness? That's what I
pray for. I know America, its people and leaders have been unwise, unkind and
unrighteous. I know that I also am a sinner in need of redemption. I know
that God's Law damns my own feeble attempts at self-justification so I come to
Him empty-handed--worse, with my hands full of my failures and asking Him
to nail them up on the cross and cleanse my heart and my hands with the blood
of Jesus.
But where from there? I am not asking for simplistic answers. I am asking
"Jeremiah" for a direction. Repentance, yes--every day with every splash of
water. I also saw the faces of those cadets. I have nephews who have been in
Iraq and Afganistan and one headed back there. I grieve over lives wasted
and believe we must have a metanoia.
But (and I mean this sincerely, not arrogantly) suppose you are the
president (take your pick, Barack or Bush). Do you simply write off the Middle East
to duke it out? Do we concern ourselves with those who hijack planes and
crash them into buildings? Do we concern ourselves with those who strap
bombs to women and children and set them off in crowded streets? Are we our
brothers' keepers when oceans separate us? Is America never a candidate as
hand of God's justice? Do we do nothing right or righteous or even, dare I
say, a bit more godly than the Taliban?
I do call my people to repentance (even as I hear that call myself) and
pray that like ripples in a pond, what is preached in my pulpit finds resonance
with other pulpits, other peoples, and we experience both the judgment of
God and grace of God.
Your words have cut into me and my request is sincere. Thursday theology
[has] been one of my teachers over the past years and I believe I am not too
old or set in my ways to learn something new.
So, without trying to dictate what/how you write in Thursday theology and
certainly not calling you out on what you've written, I am asking you to
consider my questions for another installment of Thursday Theology. I am truly
struggling to move from insight to action, to heed the Word, but I need a
clearer trumpet.
Respectfully,
Rev. David Boedecker
David,
You ask for "another installment of Thursday Theology."
That's what I thought I was asking fellow-Crossers to help me do when I
asked them (you included) to take the GOOD NEWS in Steve Kuhl's last three
steps--the Gospel's New Prognosis for the sick-unto-death client (6th century
B.C. Judah and 21st century USA) and formulate God's Good Word for our
nation. Instead of just "the nation" as a mass of folks, what is God's good word
for us to speak to those cadets whose grim and sombre faces we saw at West
Point. According to the Jeremiah text, what's God's good word for them--for
us all.
Next week's ThTh 600 intends to report out whatever "youse guys and gals"
send me as Good News for patients with such a deadly diagnosis, the very
stuff you are calling for. So send something yourself. What does the Jeremiah
text (with Steve Kuhl's masterful steps 4,5,6) give you to give to your
people in Marshall MI as God's Good News for such a time as this? What did you
already proclaim to them last Sunday when Jeremiah was the OT text and
Jesus himself in Luke was the apocalyptic preacher to people of his time--and
our own as well?
"Another installment of ThTh," you say. OK, help me put one together.
Cheers!
Ed
Dear Ed,
Is it any different now?
Yes, it is. The same place, same mess; same victims and victimizers.
What is different? A sovereign nation, America, over-impressed with itself and
its righteousness and often stuporous in its power and ability to enforce
its will, often frustrated that other nations "don't play by the rules" of
warfare as though warfare had any rules.
The Biblical metaphor is not OT, but NT, wars, rumours of wars, chaos on
earth and in the heavens. Are we not, unlike Jeremiah et al, living in the
endtimes? If so, are wars no longer instruments of specific judgment so much
as they are symptoms of a world not getting better, but worse?
The God-sized problem is humankind--American, Iraqi, etc.--our individual
and consequent rejection of the ways and will of the Prince of Peace.
Why? Because His peace, like His kingdom, is not of this world. It cannot
be. It can only summon us of this world into that kingdom entered only by
grace through faith. We don't get there by being right, only repentant.
Those faces--include cadets in gray, Angela Peacock, Ben Boedecker, US
Army--are the faces not of charioteers, but of those sent by the powers of this
world to subdue and contain those whom the powers perceive as enemies.
Those powers may be right; they may be wrong; they may be blinded to a
better way.
I would not begin to equate Jeremiah the prophet with Jeremiah the
Wright. No, not racism, not politics, but a reality in which the kingdom of God
(i.e., the nation of God's people) is not limited to ethnicity (of any kind)
but to those whom God has called and chosen. God's people exist in
America--they express themselves by vote, by persuasion, by dialog, by
prayer--Barack may be among them, but he is not a prophet, nor is he the "agent" of
God's redemption or of judgment. He is simply caught up in the chaos of a world
running out of gas.
Do we send "more charioteers" into the sea? That is for the commander in
chief both to decide and to account for.
As for the charioteers---if in conscience they choose not to go, we honor
their conscience, support their right to choose. Luther had the same problem
regarding whether soldiers can be saved. I don't think he got it any
neater or tidier than we can.
Because the world is not tidy. It is messy and bloody with actions and
attitudes co-mingled with pure, not so pure and purely impure motives.
Is God calling America to repentance? When has God not done so? Vietnam?
Korea? WW2, WW1, Civil War, 1812, Revolution, French/Indian--is not all
war God's judgment on humankind's unwillingness to respond to the grace of
God that teaches, urges us to walk with justice before our God?
Conclusion: No one is righteous, no, not even one. Not me! Not you! Not
Barack! Not any of the Crossings Community. Every human-born catastrophe is
evidence that we cannot save, fix or redeem ourselves.
There is only grace: grace for preachers like me who do their best each
week to turn hearts toward God, grace for presidents who amid myriad clamoring
voices seek to be their brother's brother.
Grace, alone, in a hopelessly messy world, where grace is the only hope we
have; where we lay hold of the branch of Jesse and hang on for a rough
ride, until by grace we reach the shore where chaos is no more (Revelation, when
the sea and its tumult is quelled).
That branch is cross-shaped--where Jesus crossed our chaos.
Till then: we hope, we pray, we vote; we offer our voice to the public
discussion and hearing the call to repent, we pass it along in the confidence
that in repentance, God's wrath is stilled and we turn to behold a Father's
face.
I wish I had more time this week to wax more exegtical--but hearts in
Marshall are breaking and I've been called to help bind them up.
Advent blessings and Christmass
Peace to you.
You may publish any/all/none of the above.
In any of those options, I thank you for troubling me.
David
P..S. from EHS.
Here's a thought. For next month's Crossings conference here in St. Louis
they've got me listed for a session labelled "Reading Real Life through the
Six Step Lens." Why not make this very topic the "real life" item to work
on? We could continue this conversation face-to-face then and there. So if
you don't have the energy or the time to send in something now, come to the
conference and join the confab in a seminar room. We could make the two
responses above--along with Steve Kuhl's promised piece next week--the grist
for the mill to get us started. The more I think about this the better it
sounds.
The major reason for you to come to the January conference is to engage the
major league keynoters: Burrows, Kaariainen and Burce.
When was the last time you ever heard a Roman Catholic theologian (Burrows)
define the Christian mission task this way? "To retrieve the centrality of
the gospel as promise revolving around the forgiveness of sin and mission
as the church's task in making known God's promise to save the world."
(President's Address to The American Society of Missiology, June 2009).
Or a Finnish "mish-kid" (Kaariainen) tell about engaging the Jesuits at
Fordham University with his doctoral dissertation on Bertram's axiom:
"promissio is the secret of missio"?
Or Crossings' own mish-kid (Burce) link his earlier mission ministry in
Papua New Guinea to the mission today of his suburban Cleveland congregation?
Cathy Lessmann (Crossings office manager) tells me that two are coming from
Singapore for the feast, and now a bishop from an African Initiated Church
(check Wikipedia for the term) in Kenya has signed up. Even as only a
foretaste of the feast to come, it promises to be a feast. Cathy says that
places at the table are still available. Verbum sapiente satis.