Thursday Theology #607
January 28, 2010
Topic: Werner Elert's Law/Gospel Textbook on Christian Ethics (Part II--Conclusion)
Colleagues,
Here's the second half of my offering at the Crossings International
conference earlier this week. And "international" it was indeed with participants
from Korea, Nigeria, Liberia, India, Singapore and Germany. The gathering
was mountaintop stuff. More next Thrusday.
A bunch of us spent most of one day looking at the theology of Werner Elert
(1885-1954). Bob Schultz, who did his doctorate under Elert, and Matt
Becker, a youngster alongside octogenrarians Schultz and EHS and today's Elert
insider, rounded out the troika. Bob and I knew Elert "live." We were his
students in the early 1950s. Matt's expertise has come from "just" reading
Elert's half dozen "big" books and manifold essays. It was a three-session
seminar. Matt took us through Elert's life and work, deftly weaving his
theological biography through the Sturm und Drang of the first half of 20th
century Germany; Bob took us through Elert's dogmatics [The Christian Faith],
which Bob is translating for English language publication, and I did a
show-and-tell on Elert's ethics [The Christian Ethos]. Last week's ThTh 606 and
this week's post, when pasted together, were my handout at the seminar.
Peace and Joy!
Ed Schroeder
Werner Elert: THE CHRISTIAN ETHOS
Chapter 6. THE NEW CREATURE
The New Creation
New creation is "brand new" - "creatio ex nihilo" - a creation from no
pre-existent material.
The "ex nihilo" character of the new creation means that it is done
exclusively by God independent of all human prior prerequisites. This is the
meaning of "sola gratia."
In Roman Catholic theology grace is so understood that the new ethos is
not a new creation, but a renovation of the old, repairing the defect,
restoring it into the original product it once was. Not so God's new creation in
the NT.
God's word of pardon actually creates a new ethos, a new person--does not
build upon some prior "good" still present in sinners--and this word in and
of itself possesses such creative power.
The Power of the Holy Spirit
The creative work of the Holy Spirit in Christians is tangible but some
of it is manifest only to the eye of faith.
When the apostles speak of the Holy Spirit, they do not refer to
psychological processes at all.
The power of the Spirit is "axiological reality" [=value-bestowing,
value-changing power] from outside myself. Because it is God's power, it does
make things happen, some of which all can see. The full picture of what all
is going on--the Spirit's generating a whole new existence for former
sinners--is perceptible only to the "pneumatic" person, the one animated by this
Holy Spirit coming from Christ.
Repentance and Rebirth
Not WHEN but WHAT is the key question about the new life. Just what is
it? The new ethos concretely operating in the life of Christ-trusters
We cannot draw from the NT an outline of a normative "standard" process,
a step-by-step sequence, for the beginning of the new life. Repentance,
conversion, rebirth are different NT terms for the same basic thing: God's
grace-verdict becoming concrete in us.
"Grace-imperatives" of the NT have humans as acting subjects AND God as
author at the same time. Not to be confused with "law-imperatives." The
two kinds of imperatives differ in the same way as law and Gospel differ in
indicative mood sentences. One is a requirement, the other an offer.
[Bertram: one is "you've got to," the other "you get to."]
The NT recognizes no state of perfection in the life of a Christian. It
recognizes only a state of growth.
Re-integration (restoring the "status integritatis." restoring the
image or God, replacing the shattered mirror)
God himself rehabilitates world history, giving sinners the status of
being "re-integrated" back to God..
Jesus Christ is the reintegrated "imago dei" present in history, who by
that very fact already transcends "standard" human history, the continuing
story of fractured images of God. With God's image restored Christians also
transcend history in the same way.
The daily life of re-integration is not "imitating Christ," but "hidden"
servanthood to this master.
Freedom
The new person is not free FOR the law, as Kant insists, but FROM the
law, as Paul teaches.
Freedom is found first of all in our relation to God, wherein we are free
from law and live a life without law, but not a lawless life.
The concept "already, not yet" applies to freedom which is on the
increase in the world actively at work secretly razing nomological reality.
[The full text (in English) of Elert's #36 Freedom exists on the Crossings
website. Here's where to find it:
http://www.crossings.org/thursday/1998/thur1217.shtml"]
Chapter 7. THE NEW OBEDIENCE
Faith
Faith is the "human side" of the new ethos of the new person. The
"God-side" of it is grace.
Despite differences of expression, the NT usage of the word faith has
this in common in all instances: person-to-person trust in Christ.
Faith in the gospel is not another way of obedience, for, strictly
speaking, one cannot "obey" the gospel; either you trust it or you distrust it.
The "obedience of faith" mentioned in the NT is precisely this, trusting the
gospel.
Obedience and Faith
The motivation for Christian obedience to the Lord Christ is faith.
Trusting Christ, we do what he calls us to do.
Obedience under the authority of Christ is first and foremost suffering
obedience.
Good works are necessary, but they do not "have to" be done to make faith
happen. The are faith's fruit.
The Venture of Works ("Wagnis der Werke" in German, the "risk," the
"daring aspect" of works)
Luther and Kierkegaard differ on interpreting the temptation of Abraham.
It is not Abraham's ethics that are challenged: to kill or not to kill
(Kierkegaard,) but his faith: to trust God's promise or not to trust it when God
himself seems to be destroying that promise (Luther).
Every human act is an adventure (a Wagnis, a risk) which the Christian
dares to undertake because of his faith in the promise.
Common works done "naturally" within the orders are just as much a
"Wagnis" as works which are extra-ORDER-nary (outside the order, even breaking
the order, the "Gefüge" where God has placed us). Both are good works when
they are done trusting Christ's promise.
Renunciation
Christ himself confronts us with the call for the "infinite resignation."
To give up everything and follow him.
Traditional Roman Catholic theology leaves the issue of renunciation up
to the individual, but Christ does not.
The infinite resignation which Christ calls for is not a renunciation of,
a flight away from, the material finite world. Rather it is the
application of faith to the total and specific content of our own particular life. To
hold things dear, but not to cling to them for dear life.
Sanctification
Sanctification and renovation raise the agenda: How can donated life also
become an active life (i.e., my human acts have me as the subject yet they
are originated by God)?
Sanctification belongs to the "cultic sphere." 1.) It literally means
drawing close to God; 2) It is redemption from guilt so that a saint (but only
a saint) can sanctify himself; and 3) It makes humans capable of becoming
living "spiritual sacrifices."
Love of the Neighbor, Love of Enemy, Brotherly Love
If a "religion of love" is what the NT proclaims, then there is nothing
new in the NT. The "law of love" is still law, nomological existence.
The NT itself has set a threefold defense against the "religion of love"
orientation. Its portrayal of neighbor-love, brother-love and
love-of-enemies (3 different categories) do not match the particulars of a generic
religion of love. Christ is a necessary player in this NT trio. He is
unnecessary in a religion of love, other than as a teacher, but someone else could
just as well be that teacher.
Since Christ always stands between God and the loving Christian and the
receiver of the Christian's love, "agape" is different from "eros" and
different from humanitarianism.
Love of God and the First Commandment
Contrary to Augustine, "love of self" cannot be the motive for loving the
brother, nor for loving God.
The Christian's "agape" for God is identical with "faith" in the
Pauline-Luther tradition.
Love fulfills the law and at the same time annuls it and sets up a
replacement order to the law's order, an "order of love and forgiveness " This
new order of love and forgiveness unfolds in mutual interaction (ping-pong
"agape"!) between God, Christ, the Christian, the fellow Christian.
Chapter 8. THE INVISIBLE STRUGGLE
Two Ways and Two Eras
The struggle in the Christian's life runs right through the middle of his
entire existence as a constant call for faith. The NT has several sets of
terms for the invisible struggle--two ways (broad and narrow), two eons (old
and new) two kinds of time (chronological and eschatological, the latter
being "kairos" time).
The difference between chronos time and kairos time is the difference
between time "managed" by law, and time managed by the promise.
The "Kairos" of Christ's promise makes chronological time in all its
parts a gift of God.
Two Kingdoms
Another pair of NT terms for the invisible struggle is the two
"basileia," the two regimes that Christians live under, both created by the Word of
God.
The present age, although Satan's domain, is also God's realm
Living in the two realms entails the problem of relating and
distinguishing the two kingdoms. Fundamental here too is that one is God's regime of
law, the other God's regime of promise.
The Third Use of the Law
The place of the law in the life of the regenerate has been a point of
conflict throughout Christian history.
In Reformation Lutheranism it became the debate about the twofold or
threefold use of God's law . Luther: only two. Melanchthon: three. Formula of
Concord: only two.
The third use of the law "recapitulates.once more the fundamental problem
of Christian ethics." It seeks to bridge the opposition between God's two
verdicts of law and Gospel. Law has the last word. The Gospel is there
only to assist in getting people to do the right thing. But in reality, the
Gospel's goal is faith, getting people to trust God's promise.
Calvin's notion of the "third use" as the law's "primary use" reveals his
conflict with Luther on both law and gospel.
Prayer
Prayer is the cry of need, weakness and despair, prime evidence of the
invisible struggle. A cry for help both for one's self (supplication) or for
another (intercession).
Christian prayer is grounded in faith in God's promise, not faith on
God's providence.
Distinctively Christian prayer is prayer as a plea for grace: Prayer "in
Jesus' name" is not invoking a magic formula, but expressing the faith that
Christ is our connection with God as Father. Thus the petition for the gift
of the Spirit (who keeps our Christ-connection alive) is the most urgent of
all.
The Beauty of the World
[Probably no other book on Christian ethics has a chapter on the beauty of
the world.]
There is a "worldly" way and a "faith" way to enjoy the beauty of the
world. Faith see Christ as reconciliation for the whole cosmos. That is the
world God "so loved." So does the Christian.
As long as sinners live under the wrath of God, every creature frightens
them for it preached their own mortality to them. Faith knows this too,
but dares against them to believe in God's promise for this cosmos and God'
presence in that world.
Thus creation is illuminated by the glory of God. Christian hope for
surviving death also applies to the creation.
Hope has disappeared from today's scientific analysis of the cosmos. Yet
Christians can rejoice in this cosmos because of their future grounded in
Christ's promise. They hear and see vicariously for the whole cosmos and
articulate God's promise for it too..
The Total Personality
The invisible struggle as a split within the human person has been
addressed since time immemorial. Though that line of struggle fluctuates, it
always goes straight through us.
Plato's solution was to see it as a body-spirit split was
"spiritualization," the non-material self (soul) survives. It is immortal, the bodily
passed away. Plato's immortality of the soul is not grounded in law/promise
theology.
The "harmonization" of the conflicting parts proposed by idealism is not
grounded in law/promise either.
Nor is the "despiritualization"--the biological is supreme--proposed by
Nietzsche, by the Nazis.
The dualism of body/spirit is an unfortunate heritage which Christianity
received from Greece. The Christian notion of reintegration is rooted in a
very different notion of the conflict. It is the conflict between two
"whole" persons within our one self. "Old Adam" and "new human." This old and
new are NOT body and spirit.
Two God-relationships are in conflict. This conflict is our dilemma.
When the image of God is restored, wholeness is restored. "As if" existence
ceases. In forgiveness the new human acknowledges the sin of the old one.
He knows his identity with that old one, for he knows that, though once
condemned to eternal extinction, the miracle of mercy has granted him a new life.
Part III
OBJECTIVE ETHOS
Chapter 9. THE CHRISTIAN TOTALITY
Localization (German: Ortsbestimmung: "Just what are we talking about")
The first 8 chapters have examined the theological ethos of individual
subjects, thus"subjective" ethos. But there is more data of Christian ethos,
namely, the ethos of the new human community, the church, created by Christ's
word of forgiveness. The body of Christ--Christ the head and we the
member--is more than the sum of the parts. That body has a "corporate" ethos of
God's approval--worth, value, quality--of its own. It is "objectively" there
even when individual members of the body have personally, "subjectively,"
deserted Christ's promise. E.g., The sacrament of baptism is valid even if
the one baptizing the candidate is an unbeliever.
Objective ethos as additional anthropological data within the corporate
church occurring in a non-nomological order.
The Church As a Corporate Community
The church functions as a corporate community, operating as a single
entity, though of many members. It acts externally and internally as a whole..
The corporate character of the church is explicit only in its
relationship to Christ in his continuing incarnation. What keeps the body of Christ
united and functioning as a whole is its relationship to Christ, namely,
Christ's continuing incarnation in the church's life.
Use and Limitation of Ethical "We" Formulas
The language of the church is not"I" language, but "we" language.
Distinguishing between the cumulative and the collective "we." The original
Nicene Creed begins "WE believe in one God." That is the body as a whole
confessing its faith, not just one "I." The difference between cumulative and
collective "We" statements is that cumulative "we" designate what all of us are
doing together. "We are all in church today." Even "each one of here is
confessing the Nicene Creed." But the WE of that creed is collective "we,"
the confession of the entire body of Christ throughout history, and not just
the folks at church this morning. Christians engage in cumulative "we"
because each of them has the same Christ-connection. Christ has forgiven each
one of them.
But when word and sacrament are administered the "collective we," the
body of Christ as a corporate entity is on the scene. Here is objective
ethos--the whole body doing something that God calls "good"-- expressing itself in
corporiety. Objective ethos is concrete public action.
The Order of Love and Forgiveness
The new order in the church can be seen and heard, first off as a new
jig-saw puzzle network (Seinsgefüge) of love and forgiveness.
Objective ethos is Christian not merely by virtue of the motivation for
the action, but because actual help occurs.
The new order of love is purely voluntary. No coercion. It is the
love-one-another generated by the gospel.
The newness of the new order is that Christ stands not only in our
relationship to God, but also in our relationship to one another.
Church discipline as part of the order of love and forgiveness, loving
care for an apostate former Christian
The "We" of the Apologists, Martyrs, and Confessions
Individual Christians on the witness stand for the faith (apologists),
those who die for the faith (martyrs) and the "we" in the Confessions is
collective we. Though individuals are making the statements, they are speaking
for the entire church, even more, they are speaking for Christ, the church's
head.
The Liturgical "We"
In the liturgical "we" the collective "we" concretizes itself purposely
before its Lord to worship him.
Liturgical ethos is a fourfold collective event: 1) Communal confession
of guilt; 2) Public proclamation of God's law and gospel 3) Corporate
absolution in the eucharist; and 4) Collective adoration as the individual member
surrenders his isolation in collective concentration on the Lord.
In using music in worship the church conquers a new realm of creation
(music = an "order" from the old creation) for the kingdom of grace.
Ecclesiastical Law and the Levels of the "We"
Who is really authorized to speak for the collective "we"? With all the
denominations and divisions in the church, which human voices speak for the
"whole church," even more speak for the head of the church?
The Roman Catholic answer to the dilemma is the Bishop of Rome,
understood to have been appointed by Christ the head, and then canon law whereby it
preserves unity at all levels.
Since the church is an order of the gospel and not an order of law (not
even "divine law"), canon law cannot perform the unifying function the Roman
church assigns to it.
Anti-Communality and Unity
The modern ecumenical movement offers both valid and invalid aspects of
the move to conquer disunity.
What creates the church's unity is what links sinners to Christ. It is
the "pure" Gospel that does that alongside sacraments administered "according
to that Gospel." The Gospel's verdict "your sins are forgiven" is the
creator of church unity. Elert concludes with a Luther citation: "Wherever you
find baptism, the Lord's supper, and the Gospel proclaimed, there kneel and
pray, for the church is a house of prayer, and Christ has made that house as
wide as the whole world." And then he adds this comment: "That is, so is
seems to me, a truly ecumenical and catholic statement. It just might be that
this alleged chief culprit in splitting the church has actually shown the
right way to overcome it."
Chapter 10. THE CHURCH AND FORCES OF HISTORY
Orders and Powers
The church is an historical and social institution, a new "order" planted
among all the other orders of old creation. [See the laundry list in
chapter 3 above.]
Orders and powers must be distinguished. Orders are the given "playing"
fields on which we live our lives.
It is on these playing fields that people with power--parents, workers,
citizens, "the powers that be"--exercise the power they have. The "order" of
the church does not run alongside the other orders (as parallel railroad
tracks), but intersects with all the orders when some one member of the body
of Christ is also in that "old" order.
Church and State
[I will simply list here the segments of this long excursus on church and
state. Elert's vast collection of data and his depth analysis is more than I
can reduce to thesis sentences.
The institutions of church and state as they intersect as a relationship
of differing orders.
The institutions of church and state as they intersect in a relationship
based on power.
The history of church-state identification in eastern Christendom.
History of church-state relations in western Christendom.
The Reformation understanding of the church-state relationship.
The return of the church-state relationship the 20th century to the
historical conditions of the first century. The conclusion (written in 1948!):
"All the world powers today are engaged in an actual war of political ideas.
Ideological warfare is now the state's agenda." An ideology is an "other"
gospels. Thus the state is no longer simply God's agent for protection and
just recompense of its citizens. It now also proclaims an other gospel.
"Thus the long history of church-state relationships returns to its
beginning in the first century."
Nonviolence as Possibility [German: The anarchist possibility.]
Is it possible, as Tolstoy proposed, to have human society with no
governing agents at all? Can evil be restrained by non-resistance, as he thought?
Not really.
Tolstoy's teaching of non-resistance understands evil to arise from human
ignorance, and thus to be rectified by insight and education. But that
vastly underestimates evil. Evil is a perverse "order" with "power" in
opposition to God in God's world. Removing human ignorance does not remove evil.
God has ordained secular power to restrain evil and protect us from evil's
destruction.
Lutheran "Dichotomy"? [German is "Doppel-Geleisigkeit"]
The German term was Troeltsch's negative term for Lutheran ethics.
Running on a double track. Love as the ethical mandate for the individual,
coercive power as the mandate for the state. This section is a long argument
with Troeltsch [and his followers, such as the two Niebuhr brothers in the USA]
and can't easily be reduced to thesis sentences. Elert concludes by
contrasting the "law of love"--God's mandate for humankind in all the orders of
nomological existence--with Christ's "new" love-commandment. He articulates
his own case for Luther's two-kingdoms. The corporate ethos of Christ's
agape-fellowship cannot be merged into God's legally structured world. "These
two cannot be reconciled because they are fundamentally different--not only
different orders, but different historical forces. These opposites cannot be
transformed into parallels running side by side and never intersecting."
The Growth of Brotherhood in the World
Elert takes the term "brotherhood" from the frequent references in the NT
to "the brothers," another corporate designation for the church as a whole,
a community. This brotherhood is a mission term with the assignment to be
intent on adding brothers/sisters to the fellowship. The fellowship as a
community impacts "secular" history. It is constantly intent on expansion
The very mandate of one-another-love (always in the plural in the NT) calls
for outreach to the other, not only in word, but in deed.
Disappearance of the conditions of brotherhood in the church came when
Constantine designated Christian faith the religion of he empire. The
brotherhood no longer was a "subversive" movement in society to gain new brothers,
but society was officially Christian. Mission accomplished. Clergy did the
church's work and "brotherhood" went into the monasteries.
The brotherhood active in the world is essential to the life of the
church. Luther called the brotherhood out of the monasteries and back into the
world and also organized "brotherhood" actions in social ministry. But the
secularization of society in the West has made it more difficult to carry
out.
Elert concludes articulating a mission theology for brotherhood-growth in
the fractured modern world. It unfolds within the orders of nomological
existence, initially supporting them, while at the same time undermining the
nomological ethos. "In these (seemingly low-key, un-glorious) ways Christian
brotherhood expands out into the world, even though the statisticians don't
notice it. That's what makes it powerful in human history."
Teleology and Eschatology
These two terms are two different ways of understanding human
history--and church history--moving to its conclusion. At root one is a law-term, the
other a Gospel-term.
What has been said above about the church as brotherhood in history and
changing history is hard to document from the data at hand. It is marked by
a "not yet." "The "telos" end has not yet arrived. But "teleology" entails
designating a goal, moving toward it, and (eventually) saying you have
"arrived."
But the power of the Christian brotherhood lies not in what has been
achieved but in its ongoing exercise of Christ's mission.
All proposals of chiliasm in church history are attempts to fix the
"telos" of the kingdom of God in history..
All modern international ideologies have grown in this soil initially
prepared by the church. Stalin, Hitler were chiliasts. Western democracies are
not far removed "fully convinced that they are the political
representatives of a Christian, universalistic, progressive reform movement" even modern
democracies are chiliastic.
Christian eschatology centers on God's new verdict about the world in
Christ, which leads to this final paragraph in the book. "The final day of
reckoning will recapitulate the entire history of the world and render God's
conclusive verdict. World history gravitates toward this goal, but not of
itself. The world powers do not aim toward it because they do not know it
exists. The Christian brotherhood believes that goal, but does not know the
when or how. The One who is himself beginning and end, alpha and omega, moves
history to this goal. Eschatology includes teleology, a goal, but only the
teleology of God. For that reason the entire Christian ethos--subjective
ethos under law and grace, objective ethos as well-- is teleological. It
yearns for the end of all things that God has in store for us, when finally
the data of history, things past, things forgotten--and above all, the
eternal-- will be revealed. The judge of the living and the dead will then reveal
the final verdict, showing everyone who we finally are."